In case you're wondering this is a diagram circulating the internet with the impressive claim of explaining the intrinsic complexities of Hollywood hype machine Inception.
The latest film by Chris Nolan (of Batman Begins, Dark Knight and Memento fame) starring a maturing-with-age Leonardo Di Caprio and plethora of other up and coming Brit and US stars, plus a few reliable old hands (Michael Caine, Pete Postlethwaite).
Cinema goers in the UK and US are going mad for this big budget, special effects blockbuster which attempts to graspe the mantel of high-concept, high brow status in the process.
It is one of the most tweeted about topics on Twitter this week as people try to unravel the plot, and The Guardian Film Blog seems to find an excuse to write about it every day.
I saw it at the weekend with my two psychologist parents, and they were less than impressed to say the least. Plot loop holes, a lack of jeopardy and a string of too-loud-for-my-mother set pieces, in their opinion did not make up for the groundbreaking special effects and dramatic pacing. I on the other hand had mixed feelings, as did my husband. We enjoyed the spectacle but found it rather superficial. It was trying really hard to be clever, but it really was not.
That said it had more brains than the usual blockbuster and was a vast improvement on the remakes and re-imaginings plaguing cinema screens in recent years. Like a cross between Nolan's previous projects Batman Begins and Memento, it played on themes of memory and loss, but these were just a coat hanger for shoe-horning in special effects like turning a New York street upside down, and having a group of sleeping people float in a zero gravity hotel room. The effects were actually the clever bit, not the dreams within dreams, within dreams and yet another dream. Are they awake? Are they dreaming? Do we care???
But despite my own mixed feelings (and there are also mixed reviews, although mostly positive) whether the film is good or bad, it really doesn't matter. What matters is that is has got people talking about film. And coming in the week the ConDemnation government announced the axing of the UK Film Council, that can only be a good thing. My parents may have claimed not to like the film but we were all talking about it for an hour afterwards, and still musing over it the next day. My mum also said she did not sleep well the night after seeing the film and I always think that is a sign of a film that makes you think.
A few days later I saw the third in the Twilight Saga, Eclipse, and despite initially being a fan of the books and films, I found it utterly uninspiring, rather dull, and completely forgettable. Some may argue (particularly teenagers and horny housewives) that it is equally as entertaining as Inception and that it may be, but it lacks the 'stuck in the head' factor.
Inception is by no means the masterpiece everyone is making it out to be, but that is not to belittle its significance and impact. People are talking and tweeting about it, creating diagrams to explain it, and using it as a platform to discuss the power, influence and effect of dreams and the possibility of planting thoughts. It is The Matrix of the social web generation and in my book anything that gets people excited about film whilst also enabling them to talk about grand theories no matter how flawed, should be applauded.